US Attorney General Loretta Lynch says the Obama
administration has deleted references to Islamic State from the transcript of
the Orlando killer’s 911 calls. She says that mentioning the group would
“re-victimize” the families of those whom he murdered.
Well, I’ve got news for the attorney general. As the father
of a victim of radical Islamic terrorism, it’s not the mention of the terrorist
group that re-victimizes me and my family. It’s the ongoing refusal of the
Obama administration to name the group to which my daughter’s killers belong
that causes us fresh pain every single day.
Alisa was a junior at Brandeis University who was visiting
Israel in 1995 when members of Palestinian Islamic Jihad attacked the bus in
which she was riding. She and seven other passengers were murdered. Some of the
terrorists involved in the attack were subsequently captured or killed. But
some of them are still walking free today — and the Obama administration is
helping to cover up for them.
Find that hard to believe? Visit www.rewardsforjutsice.net
–that’s the US Justice Department website that offers rewards for information
leading to the capture of terrorists who have killed Americans abroad. At the
bottom of their home page, click on “Middle East and North Africa.” Then go to
the right-hand column and choose the item called “Violence in Opposition to the
Middle East Peace Negotiations, 1993 – Present.”
Now as you look at this section, keep in mind that since
1993, at least 68 Americans have been murdered, and 94 wounded, by Palestinian
terrorists. Some were victimized by Fatah (the group led by the late Yasser
Arafat, and currently by Mahmoud Abbas); some by Hamas; and some, including
Alisa, by Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Also keep in mind that in some other sections of the
website—sections not involving Palestinian terrorists—the names of victims are
mentioned, and the names of the groups that harmed them are mentioned as well.
But notice the difference in the section on the Palestinian
attacks.
There, no victims’ names are mentioned. No specific attacks
are listed. No organizations — not Fatah, Hamas, or Islamic Jihad — are
identified. They are described merely as “terrorist groups and individuals
opposed to a negotiated peace agreement.”
The fact that the terrorists were trying to murder Jews or
Israelis is not even acknowledged. “The intent of these attacks,” the website
claims, “was to disrupt peace negotiations and to modify the attitudes of the
leaders engaged in them.”
They were just trying to “modify” leaders’ attitudes! It
sounds as if they were just expressing some policy disagreements, and perhaps
went a little overboard.
The website’s claim about “disrupting peace negotiations” is
not only inadequate — it’s absolutely false. Fatah was never trying to
“disrupt” negotiations. Fatah’s leaders — Arafat, then Abbas — were the ones
who were conducting the negotiations with Israel. Fatah’s terrorism was a way
of trying to increase pressure on Israel to make more concessions within the negotiations.
Fatah’s bombings and shootings were part and parcel of Arafat and Abbas’s
negotiating strategy.
All of which brings us back to the attorney general and the
“re-victimizing” claim.
The omission of the Orlando killer’s Islamic State
connection will not spare the families any additional pain. Indeed, it is the
very omission which causes them pain, just as the Obama administration’s
omission of the names of my daughter’s killers and sponsors causes my family
pain.
The names of the
Palestinian killers are omitted because the administration does not want to
irritate the Palestinian Authority, which sponsors and shelters the killers.
The name of the radical Islamic terrorist group that inspired the Orlando
killer is being omitted because the administration wants to play down any
connection between terror and Islamic factions. In other words, it’s all
politics.
That’s what “re-victimizes us,” Madam Attorney General.
Every time we look at that website, we are reminded that your administration is
willing to cover up the identity of terrorists in order to further a political
or ideological agenda.
This column first appeared on the Algemeiner.com via JNS.ORG
No comments:
Post a Comment