I am in agreement with the concluding sentence- Perhaps the larger question is why anyone should expect that a peace process that begins by setting murderers free is likely to result in peace.Because of website restrictions at WSJ.com, I've printed the entire editorial. If you wish to read it on line, try Palestinian Heroes.
Are you in favor of the release of convicted murderers? Let me know what you think.
Stephen M. Flatow
Palestinian Heroes: Releasing murderers will not advance the
peace process
South Africa has Nelson Mandela, Poland has John Paul II,
and Burma has Aung San Suu Kyi: Though the measure isn't exact, one way to
judge a nation is by looking at its heroes. So what does it say about a
prospective state of Palestine that among its heroes is Salah Ibrahim Ahmad
Mugdad?
Mugdad is among 104 prisoners Israel intends to release as
part of a deal orchestrated by Secretary of State John Kerry to resume peace
talks with the Palestinians. In 1993, Mugdad killed hotel security guard Israel
Tenenbaum "by beating him in the head with a steel rod," according to
the Times of Israel. Tenenbaum was 72 at the time of his murder.
Also being released is Salameh Abdallah Musleh, imprisoned
for the murder of convenience-store owner Reuven David. "Abdallah,
together with an accomplice, entered David's convenience store on May 20, 1991,
bound David's arms and legs and beat him to death, before locking the store and
fleeing the scene," the Times reports.
Ditto for other Palestinian prisoners. Every society has its
criminals, psychotics and killers, and Israel is no exception. But it says
something about the current Palestinian leadership that it has made the release
of killers a condition of peace talks. It also says something about the moral
values of too many Palestinians that they should treat the returning prisoners
not as pariahs but as heroes.
The Israeli decision to release the prisoners was shortly
followed by the approval of additional construction permits for housing in East
Jerusalem and West Bank settlements. The move elicited howls of condemnation
from the usual suspects, as if building houses is more objectionable than
murdering people in cold blood. Perhaps the larger question is why anyone
should expect that a peace process that begins by setting murderers free is likely
to result in peace.
1 comment:
This is great!
Post a Comment