Searching for new ways to fund a terrorist regime.
By Stephen M. Flatow
The United States doesn’t finance schools in Iran or North
Korea. So why should it pay for those under the Palestinian Authority, which
not only sponsors terrorists but spreads some of the most vicious anti-American
propaganda in the world?
(March 15, 2021 / JNS)
Question: How do you get the American government to finance
a terrorist regime when U.S. law prevents it from doing so?
Answer: Twist the meaning of words, claim that the law
doesn’t say what it obviously says and pretend the regime doesn’t sponsor
terror. In other words, play the usual games.
Those games are in full swing now in the campaign to put
American taxpayers’ dollars into the pockets of the Palestinian Authority.
Last week, The New York Times published a gigantic feature
story about a Palestinian Arab school located in the village of Jaba near
Bethlehem that supposedly will be in dire straits unless it starts receiving
large amounts of American aid, and fast.
 |
| Jaba School, NY Times |
The article, by Times correspondent Adam Rasgon, never
considers the question of why the P.A. chooses to fund terrorists rather than
its own schools. Last year, the P.A. distributed $15 million monthly
—monthly!—on salaries for terrorists who are imprisoned in Israel. Just one
month of those funds could have built quite a few schools.
Instead, Rasgon’s entire article was based on the premise
that America has some kind of obligation to pay for the P.A.’s schools.
The United States does send humanitarian assistance to
various impoverished countries, but not to anti-American, terror-sponsoring
regimes. The United States doesn’t finance schools in Iran or North Korea. So
why should it pay for schools under the P.A., which not only sponsors
terrorists but spreads some of the most vicious anti-American propaganda in the
world?
Moreover, what exactly is being taught in the school that
the Times wants American taxpayers to support? P.A. school textbooks are
notorious for glorifying terrorism and vilifying Israel and America. Are we
supposed to believe that the Jaba school will be the first P.A. school to use a
moderate, peace-promoting curriculum?
One of the main commentators quoted in the Times article was
Joel Braunold, who was described as “an expert on U.S. law surrounding foreign
aid to the Palestinians.” Braunold made it clear he is troubled that U.S. law,
specifically the Taylor Force Act, prohibits sending aid to the P.A. so long as
it pays terrorists.
So Braunold plays word games to get around that inconvenient
law.
He asks: “Would funding construction of this school, which
is controlled by the Palestinian government, be considered direct support of
the Palestinian Authority? It may or may not be. It is up to the Secretary of
State to decide.”
Braunold is obviously hoping that the current Secretary of
State, unlike his predecessor, will change the plain meaning of the term
“direct support” so that the Taylor Force Act can be discarded, and the U.S.
can start sending checks to the P.A.
Braunold and the Times are not the only ones playing word
games in order to get aid to the P.A. Recently, David Makovsky—former
right-hand man to ex-Mideast envoy Martin Indyk—has been promoting the idea
that the P.A. should dress up its payments-to-terrorists program as “a welfare
system” that would pretend to hand out money based on financial need (instead
of based on how many Jews the recipient murdered). Makovsky was doing what we
call “saying the quiet part out loud”—giving away, in public, what he hopes the
P.A. will do in order to perpetrate a farce on American taxpayers.
One last word about Joel Braunold, the “expert” who was
quoted prominently in the article about the school. The Times correspondent,
Adam Rasgon, somehow “forgot” to mention that Braunold is the managing director
at a left-wing think tank, the S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace,
which just happens to advocate U.S. funding for the P.A. (Key activists at the
center in years past have included J Street leader Jeremy Ben-Ami and Sara
Ehrman, one of the founders of Americans for Peace Now.)
I would welcome a serious and robust public discussion about
the question of American aid to the P.A. and the Taylor Force Act. What I don’t
like are the dishonest tactics being used by some of those who are promoting
the Palestinian cause.
So, please, don’t tell us that the United States has some
kind of obligation to finance P.A. schools. Tell us what’s being taught in
those schools if you want us to fund them.
Don’t tell us that the Secretary of State can arbitrarily change
the meaning of U.S. law. He cannot.
Don’t give the P.A. advice on how to pull the wool over the
American public’s eyes so that it can get our money. And don’t pretend that an
advocate for Palestinian funding is some kind of neutral “expert.”
Most of all, stop searching for new ways to get American
dollars to a terror-sponsoring regime. Instead, try searching for ways to force
the P.A. to change its terrorist ways. That would be a real step towards Middle
East peace.
Stephen M. Flatow is a vice president of the Religious
Zionists of America, an attorney in New Jersey and the father of Alisa Flatow,
who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995.
He is the author of “A Father’s Story: My Fight for Justice Against Iranian
Terror.”
Posts
